INTRODUCTION Specific pharmacological strategies in the treatment of the acute phase of a cerebral infarct are directed towards potentiating reperfusion (antithrombotic or thrombolytic drugs) and neuroprotection as early on as possible. DEVELOPMENT. The antithrombotic agents are anticoagulants, hypofibrinogemiant agents (Ancrod) and antiaggregants. The IST was done with anticoagulants, using heparin subcutaneously which causes increased bleeding without any obvious benefit. Others have used heparinoids (TOAST) or low molecular weight heparins (FISS or FISS bis) with no benefit either but with excessive bleeding with the former. Regarding Ancrod, a recent North American study (STAT) with administration of it within three hours showed significant benefit three months later. Another European study is still underway (ESTAT). With regard to antiaggregants, IST and CAST were done using Aspirin, showing a drop in early recurrences and increase in recoveries, so that aspirin has been recommended for use during the first 48 hours. There are studies using abciximab (Reopro), a blocker of the IIb-IIIa glycoprotein receptors, in which phase II data have shown that it is safe and tends to improve the outcome. A study on phase III is currently ongoing. The thrombolytic drugs have been evaluated in various trials. The PROACT study evaluated intra-arterial pro-UK and showed significant recanalization of middle cerebral artery occlusions, but with a larger number of hemorrhages and no reduction in mortality and besides, in PROACT II the outcome of treated patients was better. The NINDS trial using intravenous rt-PA (0.9 mg/kg in <3 hours) showed an improved functional state 3 months later. In the ECASS doses of 1.1 mg/kg of rt-PA in <6 hours were used and improvement was seen after three months which was countered by an increase in cerebral hemorrhage and mortality. The ECASS II, with similar dosage to NINDS and an identical window to ECASS, showed a favorable tendency in the evolution of the treated group, with no increase in symptomatic intracranial hemorrhages. Neuroprotectors have shown to be effective in experimental models of ischaemia but at the moment there is no definite evidence of their benefit in the numerous trials carried out on humans, although some subgroups of patients seem to benefit from some of them. Studies therefore are still being done. In future their use in combination with thrombolysis may be considered.
KeywordsAntiaggregantsAnticoagulantsAntithromboticsCerebral infarctNeuroprotectorsThrombolyticsCategoriesPatología vascular
FULL TEXT(solo disponible en lengua castellana / Only available in Spanish)
Si ya es un usuario registrado en Neurologia, introduzca sus datos de inicio de sesión.
Rellene los campos para registrarse en Neurologia.com y acceder a todos nuestros artículos de forma gratuita
¿Olvidó su contraseña? Introduzca su correo electrónico y le haremos llegar una nueva
¡CONVIÉRTASE EN USUARIO PREMIUM DE NEUROLOGIA.COM!
Al hacerse premium, está apoyándonos para que Revista de Neurología
siga siendo uno de los referentes de habla hispana en la difusión del
conocimiento en neurociencias. ¡Gratuita tanto para autores como para
todos los usuarios de la web!
Además, por convertirte en usuario premium, recibirá las siguientes ventajas:
Plaza asegurada en todos nuestros Másteres (www.ineurocampus.com)
Descuento del 5% en los cursos de “Actualización en Neurología”, la FMC que estará disponible próximamente en la web.
Descarga gratuita en formato PDF dos de las obras con más éxito publicadas por Viguera Editores:
Oromotors Disorders in childhood (M. Roig-Quilis; L. Pennington)
Manual de Neuropsicología 2ª ed. (J. Tirapu-Ustárroz; M. Ríos-Lago; F. Maestú)
El precio para hacerse Premium durante el periodo de un año es de 5€, que podrá pagar a continuación a través de una pasarela de pago seguro con tarjeta de crédito, transferencia bancaria o PayPal:
OPEN ACCESS
